Thursday, November 10, 2011

Time To End Occupy Wall Steet

I wrote in an earlier post that the protest movement known as Occupy Wall Street had an important message to tell, namely, the need to reform Wall Street and its banking practices. In keeping with that message, I suggested that Reform Wall Street would be a better name.

As often happens, the protest movement has taken a life of its own, with protests and occupations in many cities around the world, including my own, Montreal. It has also drawn both professional protesters and agitators, as well as anarchists and anti-Semitics (see here, here and here), who view all the world's problems, financial and otherwise, a result of a world Jewish cabal. The anti-capitalists and Marxists have jumped in, seeing this as an opportunity. In addition, there are also homeless individuals who drift in and out of these makeshift shelters, or camps, temporary villages within cities. This is the expected outcome when you decide to set up camp.

There has also been an unfortunate death. In Vancouver, Ashlie Gough, a 23-year-old woman from Victoria, British Columbia, died from an apparent drug overdose (see here, here and here). It's true that she might have died elsewhere, regardless of where she was situated. Yet, it's not the message that Occupy Wall Street and its copycat spinoffs want to send to the powers and government leaders.

The protest movement's message has been heard (see here). It's time to now work within the system to reform it through the democratic institutions that are now in place. A occupation is not the same as a protest. A long-term stay will likely dilute the message and actually hurt the cause of banking and economic reform. So, it's time to break camp and end Occupy Wall Street.

2 comments:

  1. A movement with no stated goals is a movement whose goals cannot be met. A protest that is never scheduled to end is one that seeks to replace the existing political system rather than bring about reforms. 99% vs. 1% sounds Marxist, since it reduces all differencees to economics. What does Marxism mean? It has always meant famine.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Marxism makes many promises but delivers only misery to the vast majority of persons under its rule. Democracy and capitalism, despite its temporary excesses, is far superior, fairer and leads to greater advancement and progress.

    ReplyDelete

All comments ought to reflect the post in question. All comments are moderated; and inappropriate comments, including those that attack persons, those that use profanity and those that are hateful, will not be tolerated. So, keep it on target, clean and thoughtful. This is not a forum for personal vendettas or to create a toxic environment. The chief idea is to engage, to discuss and to critique issues. Doing so within acceptable norms will make the process more rewarding and healthy for everyone. Accordingly, anonymous comments will not be posted.