Friday, November 9, 2012

No Criticism Of Thai's Royal Family Allowed

Freedom Of Speech

An Associated Press article published in the Washington Post points out that freedom of speech is restricted in many nations, and for many reasons. In Thailand, for example, it is a crime to criticize the ruling royal family of King Bhumibol Adulyadej. The article notes:
A Thai-born American who spent more than a year in prison on charges of insulting Thailand’s king says the country’s harsh laws outlawing criticism of the monarchy are holding back its democratic development. He has vowed never to return until his motherland stops being so “thin-skinned” and allows full freedom of expression.
Joe Gordon, who was convicted last year of translating excerpts of an unauthorized biography of King Bhumibol Adulyadej from English into Thai and posting them online, said those jailed under Thai laws protecting the royal family often suffer abuse from prison guards and are treated “like animals.” While he now denies committing any crime, Gordon pleaded guilty and was sentenced to two and a half years in prison before receiving a royal pardon in July.
The punishment was a high-profile example of the severe sentences meted out here for defaming Thailand’s royal family, a crime known as “lese majeste.” The issue has drawn international attention and raised concern about freedom of speech in this Southeast Asian kingdom best known as the easygoing Land of Smiles, a tourist paradise that draws some 19 million visitors per year.
Gordon’s case also raised questions about the applicability of Thai law to acts committed by foreigners outside Thailand, since he posted the link while residing in the U.S. state of Colorado. “Freedom of expression is not harassment, and Thai people don’t understand that,” Gordon told The Associated Press before his planned departure from the country Thursday. He said in Thailand the attitude is “if you don’t believe and you don’t follow us in the way we are doing things, it means you are insulting us.”
That shows how far Thailand is from understanding the liberal democratic values and traditions that inform western nations. But then again, how could its citizens understand ideas that are completely foreign to them? The penalty for "insulting" the monarchy range from three to fifteen years behind bars.

You can read the rest of the article at [Washington Post]


  1. Monarchy is based on the theory that the nation is the private property of the royal family and thus is automatically willed to the monarch's heirs.
    The Kim Dynasty in North Korea is teaching the world how monarchies come into existence.
    When royal families lose their power and become figureheads, as has happened in Britain, they typically become trailer-park trash, despite their fabulous wealth.

  2. In Russia during the times of the Tsars, the head of the Orthodox Church anointed the Tsar, investing him with divine authority. To criticize the Tsar was to go against G-d, which was an excellent excuse for meting out a harsh punishment. It was far more serious to verbally say something against the Tsar than to murder another Russian commoner.


Comment Policy:

All comments will be moderated; and bear in mind that anonymous, hostile, vulgar and off-topic comments will not be published. Thoughtful, reasonable and clear comments, bearing your real name, will be. All comments must be in English.