Saturday, March 29, 2014

Synesthesia & Technology

The Human Mind


Anticipating 1960s Pop Art: “An Aspiration to Enfold All”
Source: PubDomain

An article, by Benjamin Breen, in the Public Domain Review looks at the Victorian's understanding of the relationship between art and spirituality and between art and technology; and in all this musings the role and influence of synesthesia , a neurological condition affecting approximately four percent of the population where the simulation of one sense produces experience in another sense, for example, some individuals can taste or feel colours. It is often the case that people with synesthesia associate sounds with colours; is it possible that such individuals might be the keys to understanding and unlocking the human mind, which has yet to reveal all of its secrets.

During the Victorian era, there were many efforts to understand the emerging and domineering  role of technology in light of human spirituality and mysticism, to give magic or some secret esoteric knowledge instead of hard science some room in human imagination and thinking.

Today, science would explain synesthesia in terms of a neurological condition, and scoff at anything to do with occult, mysticism or the writings and musings of theosophy, a philosophical system of belief in hidden knowledge. Yet, its influences are ever-present among many of our notable artists. For example, Kandinsky was greatly influenced by theosophy and the views of Madame Blavatsky, who also adopted eastern esotericism into her general beliefs. Yeats, the great Irish poet, was another notable greatly influenced by Madame Blavatsky.

Breen begins the essay by quoting Yeats:
“II have always considered myself a voice of what I believe to be a greater renaissance — the revolt of the soul against the intellect — now beginning in the world,” wrote William Butler Yeats to his mentor, the Irish nationalist John O’Leary, in 1892. Yeats believed that magic was central not only to his art, but to a dawning epoch when spirituality and technology would march together toward an uncertain future.
Thought-Forms, a strange, beguiling, frequently pretentious, utterly original book first published in 1901, emerged from this ferment of late-Victorian mysticism. It was written by Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater, erstwhile members of the London Theosophical Society alongside Yeats, and it features a stunning sequence of images that illustrate the book’s central argument: emotions, sounds, ideas and events manifest as visual auras.
The book’s grand ambitions are evident from the first page. “To paint in earth’s dull colours the forms clothed in the living light of other worlds,” Besant laments, “is a hard and thankless task.” She insists that the images in the book “are not imaginary forms, prepared as some dreamer thinks that they ought to appear.” Rather, “they are representations of forms actually observed as thrown off by ordinary men and women.” And she hopes that they will make the reader “realise the nature and power of his thoughts, acting as a stimulus to the noble, a curb on the base.” This grandiloquence was typical: fin de siècle occult leaders produced some of the most baroque writing in literary history, the purplest of purple prose.
Yet what are we saying, exactly, when we call black words on a white page “purple”?
These sorts of underlying associations between words, colors and sounds were precisely what motivated Thought-Forms. In other words, the book was about synesthesia. The illustration of the music of Mendelssohn reproduced above, for instance, depicts yellow, red, blue and green lines rising out of a church. This, Leadbeater and Besant explain, “signifies the movement of one of the parts of the melody, the four moving approximately together denoting the treble, alto, tenor and bass respectively.” Moreover, “the scalloped edging surrounding the whole is the result of various flourishes and arpeggios, and the floating crescents in the centre represent isolated or staccato chords.” Color and sound had become commingled.
Such ideas never really die; they take on life in new forms, consistent with the technologies of the day; this is one reason why it is important to understand its history and its imprint on the human mind and imagination. I consider both science and art as necessary for humans, and value them both. Science is necessary and important to answer questions that science is best suited to answer, as is art; which not so much answers questions, but channels them into the beautiful and inspiring music, poetry, paintings and literary masterpieces that speak to all of humanity.

****************
You can read the rest of the article at [PubDomain]
-

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments ought to reflect the post in question. All comments are moderated; and inappropriate comments, including those that attack persons, those that use profanity and those that are hateful, will not be tolerated. So, keep it on target, clean and thoughtful. This is not a forum for personal vendettas or to create a toxic environment. The chief idea is to engage, to discuss and to critique issues. Doing so within acceptable norms will make the process more rewarding and healthy for everyone. Accordingly, anonymous comments will not be posted.